Description
International Trade Theories
Comparative advantage influences international trade patterns. Countries
are constantly trying to achieve and/or maintain it. However, the
determinants of a country’s comparative advantage are numerous. In a
critical essay, please:
-Explain factor-price structures considering the Hecksher-Ohlin (H-O)
model.
-Appraise the challenges that may be encountered by a developing versus
a developed nation.
-Analyze in which commodities, other than oil, will the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia have a comparative advantage according to the H-O
model, after the Saudi Vision 2030 is fully implemented?
Directions:
• Your essay is required to be four to five pages in length, which
does not include the title page and reference pages, which are never
a part of the content minimum requirements.
• Support your submission with course material concepts, principles,
and theories from the textbook and at least three scholarly, peerreviewed journal articles. Use the Saudi Digital Library to find
your resources.
• Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and
follow APA style guidelines.
• It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into
Turnitin prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading. If
you are unsure how to submit an assignment into the Originality
Check tool, review the Turnitin – Student Guide for step-by-step
instructions.
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this
assignment.
Name
CT_Rubric_100
Description
100 Points
Rubric Detail
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Exceeds Expectation
Meets Expectation
Some Expectations
Unsatisfactory
Content
33 to 35 points
29 to 32 points
26 to 28 points
0 to 25 points
Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive knowledge of
the materials, with no
errors or major
omissions.
Demonstrates adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may include
some minor errors or
omissions.
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the materials
and/or includes some
major errors or omissions.
Fails to demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many major
errors or omissions.
33 to 35 points
29 to 32 points
26 to 28 points
0 to 25 points
Provides strong thought,
insight, and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides adequate
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts and
applications.
Provides poor though,
insight, and analysis of
concepts and applications.
Provides little or no
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts and
applications.
15 to 15 points
13 to 14 points
11 to 12 points
0 to 10 points
Sources go above and
beyond required criteria
and are well chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Sources meet required
criteria and are
adequately chosen to
provide substance and
perspectives on the issue
under examination.
Sources meet required
criteria but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and perspectives
on the issue under
examination.
Source selection and
integration of knowledge
from the course is clearly
deficient.
15 to 15 points
13 to 14 points
11 to 12 points
0 to 10 points
Project is clearly
organized, well written,
and in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and paragraph
structure, contains no
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style, or
APA citations and
references.
Project is fairly well
organized and written
and is in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Reasonably
good sentence and
paragraph structure, may
include a few minor
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style, or APA
citations and references.
Project is poorly organized
and written and may not
follow proper format as
outlined in the assignment.
Inconsistent to inadequate
sentence and paragraph
development, and/or
includes numerous or
major errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style or APA
citations and references.
Project is not organized
or well written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor quality
work; unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style, and
APA citations and
references.
Analysis
Sources
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
View Associated Items
Print
Close Window
Critical Thinking Assignment Cover Page
All critical thinking assignments need to include a cover page containing the following information:
Course Code with CRN Code: (i.e., CS507-12345)
Course Name: (i.e., Introduction to Cyber Security and Digital Crime)
Assignment Name and Module #: (i.e., Risk Assessment Module 11)
Maximum Points on Assignment: (i.e., 110 points)
Student ID
Student Name
Submission Date __/__/____
Example cover page:
Comparative advantage influences international trade patterns. Countries
are constantly trying to achieve and/or maintain it. However, the
determinants of a country’s comparative advantage are numerous. In a
critical essay, please:
-Explain factor-price structures considering the Hecksher-Ohlin (H-O)
model.
-Appraise the challenges that may be encountered by a developing versus
a developed nation.
-Analyze in which commodities, other than oil, will the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia have a comparative advantage according to the H-O
model, after the Saudi Vision 2030 is fully implemented?
Directions:
• Your essay is required to be four to five pages in length, which
does not include the title page and reference pages, which are never
a part of the content minimum requirements.
• Support your submission with course material concepts, principles,
and theories from the textbook and at least three scholarly, peerreviewed journal articles. Use the Saudi Digital Library to find
your resources.
• Use Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and
follow APA style guidelines.
• It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into
Turnitin prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading. If
you are unsure how to submit an assignment into the Originality
Check tool, review the Turnitin – Student Guide for step-by-step
instructions.
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this
assignment.
Name
CT_Rubric_100
Description
100 Points
Rubric Detail
Levels of Achievement
Criteria
Exceeds Expectation
Meets Expectation
Some Expectations
Unsatisfactory
Content
33 to 35 points
29 to 32 points
26 to 28 points
0 to 25 points
Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive knowledge of
the materials, with no
errors or major
omissions.
Demonstrates adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may include
some minor errors or
omissions.
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the materials
and/or includes some
major errors or omissions.
Fails to demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many major
errors or omissions.
33 to 35 points
29 to 32 points
26 to 28 points
0 to 25 points
Provides strong thought,
insight, and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Provides adequate
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts and
applications.
Provides poor though,
insight, and analysis of
concepts and applications.
Provides little or no
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts and
applications.
15 to 15 points
13 to 14 points
11 to 12 points
0 to 10 points
Sources go above and
beyond required criteria
and are well chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Sources meet required
criteria and are
adequately chosen to
provide substance and
perspectives on the issue
under examination.
Sources meet required
criteria but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and perspectives
on the issue under
examination.
Source selection and
integration of knowledge
from the course is clearly
deficient.
15 to 15 points
13 to 14 points
11 to 12 points
0 to 10 points
Project is clearly
organized, well written,
and in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and paragraph
structure, contains no
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style, or
APA citations and
references.
Project is fairly well
organized and written
and is in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Reasonably
good sentence and
paragraph structure, may
include a few minor
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style, or APA
citations and references.
Project is poorly organized
and written and may not
follow proper format as
outlined in the assignment.
Inconsistent to inadequate
sentence and paragraph
development, and/or
includes numerous or
major errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style or APA
citations and references.
Project is not organized
or well written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor quality
work; unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style, and
APA citations and
references.
Analysis
Sources
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
View Associated Items
Close Window
Critical Thinking Assignment Cover Page
All critical thinking assignments need to include a cover page containing the following information:
Course Code with CRN Code: (i.e., CS507-12345)
Course Name: (i.e., Introduction to Cyber Security and Digital Crime)
Assignment Name and Module #: (i.e., Risk Assessment Module 11)
Maximum Points on Assignment: (i.e., 110 points)
Student ID
Student Name
Submission Date __/__/____
Example cover page:
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
