Call toll free: +1 (304) 900-6229 or Request a call

My nephew Walter James Artis Jr. was subjected to a force plea based on a letter his mother wrote and had other family members’ sign to force a plea

My nephew Walter James Artis Jr. was subjected to a force plea based on a letter his mother wrote and had other family members’ sign to force a plea confession. Walter James Artis Jr., rush to plea violated his constitutional civil, rights. Walter was not feeling well that day on September 10, 2024, and the attorney Chandra Justice asked for more time.  The Judge denied and stated a decision to plea or trial will be today.  Chandra Justice is not a trial lawyer; therefore, she would have proceeded to trial working outside of her law license.  Which is a direct violation of his due process of law and his civil rights. Walter is on 10mg of daily doses of Prozac with side effects and Adderall with side effects. Walter parental rights were taken away in family court and he can have no contact with his children which is unconstitutional. Walter was promised under the pretense of receiving pictures of his children is what led to his swift plea of guilty. The state of Illinois has the duty of the burden of proof and Walter James Artis Jr. is presumed innocent until proven guilty. Walter James Artis Jr. is the only person that can determine whether he wants he wants to do a plea deal or a trial. The presiding judge also denied the family the right to hire a trial lawyer for him to receive a fair trial. I also suspected ex par te    was being secretly being initiated towards favoring the other side.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

In the mini lecture, we discussed the policy implications of trait theories. Primarily, we looked at the implications for treatment, rehabilitation, and

In the mini lecture, we discussed the policy implications of trait theories. Primarily, we looked at the implications for treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention. Let’s expand this discussion to the criminal justice system. Specifically, the adjudication stage. Please address the following: Should individuals with Antisocial Personality Disorder be held responsible for

n this discussion, you’ll complete your first of three Walk In My Shoes assignments. These learning activities, which will end in your final presentation,

n this discussion, you’ll complete your first of three Walk In My Shoes assignments. These learning activities, which will end in your final presentation, explore corrections through the perspectives of individuals most impacted by these systems. We’ll begin by reading two articles from “Life Inside,” a weekly first-person series written by real

part A (2.3 Discussion: Police Organizations) Why This Discussion? Now that you’ve learned about police organizations, it’s time to apply what you’ve

part A (2.3 Discussion: Police Organizations) Why This Discussion? Now that you’ve learned about police organizations, it’s time to apply what you’ve learned while acting again as the chief of the Atlanta Police Department. Since police chiefs are expected to make evidence-based decisions as police leaders, consider what evidence from the

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following: Using the technique of screening for suitability,

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following: Using the technique of screening for suitability, feasibility, acceptability, distinguishability, completeness, and evaluation criteria, conduct a critical analysis to identify the most practical course of action (COA). Develop a comparison matrix slide that examines the COAs

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following: Using the technique of screening for suitability,

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following: Using the technique of screening for suitability, feasibility, acceptability, distinguishability, completeness, and evaluation criteria, conduct a critical analysis to identify the most practical course of action (COA). Develop a comparison matrix slide that examines the COAs